The report found that regular monitoring is required as
accurate live weight gain information is required to plan the feed intakes for
the heifers. I have found this to be true in my own experience as calves with a very low ADG have been thought by the grazier to be doing very well and in fact they have been going backwards. Regular monitoring can pick this up before the condition scoring perception was able to.
LR McNaughton* and T Lopdell (2013) Effect of heifer live
weight on calving pattern and milk production, Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 73,
103-107
Abstract
Many heifers on New Zealand dairy farms fail to reach their
target live weight. This failure leads to lost milk production and poorer
reproductive performance. This study investigated effects of breed and region
on heifer live weight and also effects of pre-calving heifer live weight (18–21
months) on milk production. Less Friesian heifers reached their target live
weight than Jerseys, or Crossbreds (85.3 versus 89.3 versus 88.1%; P
<0.001). Heifers born in Otago (91.9%) and Taranaki (91.8%) were the closest
to achieving their target live weight, whilst those born on the West Coast
(85.6%) and Northland (86.0%) had the greatest number of heifers not reaching
their target. Heifers that had only one calving recorded on the database were a
significantly lower percentage of target live weight than those heifers that
had two calvings recorded (83.5% versus 87.1%; P <0.001). In heifers with a
live weight record between 18 and 21 months of age, every 1% increase in the
percentage of target live weight attained was associated with an increase in
milk volume of 23 ± 0.6 litres in the first lactation and 24 ± 0.9 litres in
the second lactation. Further work is required on the economics of feeding
heifers to achieve their target live weight.
No comments:
Post a Comment